Talk:1995 in literature
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 1995 in literature article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article contains broken links to one or more target anchors:
The anchors may have been removed, renamed, or are no longer valid. Please fix them by following the link above, checking the page history of the target pages, or updating the links. Remove this template after the problem is fixed | Report an error |
Policy
[edit]Is there a policy on these "year in literature" pages as to which books should go on the lists? I'm not saying that this might be useful: I'd just be interested to know whether the titles mentioned so far reflect personal preferences, best seller lists, books that have been taken up into the canon, or whatever. --KF 12:09 Mar 25, 2003 (UTC)
- Yes, exactly. - DavidWBrooks 23:52, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
Categories:
- List-Class novel articles
- Mid-importance novel articles
- WikiProject Novels articles
- List-Class Book articles
- WikiProject Books articles
- List-Class Literature articles
- Low-importance Literature articles
- List-Class Years articles
- Low-importance Years articles
- List-Class Years articles of Low-importance
- List-Class List articles
- Low-importance List articles
- WikiProject Lists articles